Cu+Cu 22.4 GeV Charged Hadron Spectra

The following Event Cuts have been incorporated into the analysis:


Event Vertex Distribution in Z with a cut of ±30cm along the Beamline


Event Vertex Distribution transverse to the beam axis with a circle
cut of 1cm around the mean values of the distribution.

Track Selection has been made as follows:

The Centrality was determined utilizing a Glauber Model simulation performed by Dr. Jim Draper which reproduces the Cu+Cu 22 GeV Reference Multiplicity Distribution:


Cu+Cu 22 GeV Reference Multiplicty for TrigID 86011 and Glauber Model Simulation

Centrality Refmult Borders
Centrality Reference Multiplicity
5% ≥ 86
10% ≥ 72
20% ≥ 51
30% ≥ 35
40% ≥ 24
50% ≥ 16
60% ≥ 10
70% ≥ 6
80% ≥ 4
Mean Refmult
Centrality From Glauber From Refmult Npart Ncoll
0 - 5% 97.5 96.9 109 182
0 - 10% 87.9 87.3
5 - 10% 78.2 77.7 90 138
10 - 20% 60.4 60.0 70 100
20 - 30% 42.1 41.6 51 64
30 - 40% 28.7 28.2 35.5 40
40 - 50% 19.3 18.8 24 24
50 - 60% 12.4 11.8
60 - 70% 7.5 6.9
50 - 70% 9.95 13 12

Note: Online QA files can be found here (Select Run 5 from bottom, Select Run Period CuCu @ 22GeV from above and click on the select button to display runs.

TRIGGER:


Reference Multiplicity seperated by Trigger ID. As with the Au+Au 19.6 GeV Dataset, the ZDC trigger was of little use for triggering on central events (see below). The BBC-narrow trigger has been selected for this analysis.


BBC ADC Sum vs. ZDC ADC Sum


The normal distribution is not see here either since the ZDC does not have good rapidity coverage for the low energy Cu+Cu 22 GeV collisions.


CTB ADC sum Vs BBC ADC Sum


CTB adc sum vs. BBC adc sum


η DISTRIBUTION:


The pseudorapidity distribution is shown for top 10%, 10-20%, 20-30%... centralities.

Cu+Cu 22 GeV collisions had low enough luminosity that they shouldn't suffer from pile up events.
[Insert Rate Plot]

Secondary Vertices were not reconstructed however as we don't expect pileup this should not be an issue

Beam Pipe vacumm was good and beam pipe events were less than 1% of the dataset and only in the peripheral collisions. They can be eliminated with a Mean-Eta vs. CTB multiplicty Cut and/or a Mean-Eta vs. Refmult cut.


Momentum Resolution at Magnetic Field of 0.25T (source: TPC NIM Paper)


Momentum Resolution at Magnetic Field of 0.5T (source: Run4 AuAu 200 GeV Embedding P05ic)